EFFORTS TO
increase forest-dependent villagers' rights and access to forest
products are fundamental to the community forestry approach.
Competition over forest resources can arise between governments and
forest users, among different communities of forest users, and
among groups within a forest-dependent community. How the potential
benefits of forest resources should be distributed is a key
question.
Distribution of Rights Between
Governments and Forest Users
Governments
in Asia have tended to see the state itself as the prime
beneficiary of forests, whether forests are managed as producers of
timber revenue or as protected national resources. Yet, concerns
about deforestation and population growth have encouraged
governments in many Asian countries to experiment with ways to
provide forest dwellers with legal access to forest lands, and to
share responsibility for forest management with local people.
Although access has been limited to date, the change nevertheless
reflects a fundamental shift in the thinking of forest departments.
There is growing recognition that local people can be partners in
forest management and have rights to a share of forest
resources.
Efforts to
give villagers more secure access to forest lands under forest
department jurisdiction are rooted in several demonstrated
advantages. First, and most simply, these rights benefit local
communities. They enable communities to enhance their incomes and
collect forest products for household use, without government
harassment.
Second,
official arrangements providing access or secure tenure encourage
villagers to think of the long term and to use forests
sustainably—to plant trees, conserve protected areas, and
adopt agroforestry practices. Local villagers are also in the best
position to know the area and provide continual, intensive
attention. The recognition that improved management mutually
benefits forest departments and local communities has proved
essential to each party's participation in these programs.
Third, giving
villagers legal rights of access to public forest resources
advances their autonomy and decision-making power relative to the
state. Legal rights to the