View all Archives -
Environment and Development »
Forestry for Sustainable Rural Development
PART
THREE Conclusion
THE COMMUNITY
forestry programs reviewed in this report represent 15 years of
experience in six Asian countries that contain more than half the
world's population. Rural people whose lives have been directly
affected by those programs number in the millions, and
participating agency staff, researchers, and NGO personnel number
in the thousands. The Ford Foundation alone has spent more than $40
million on the programs described, and other donors have spent even
more. Thus, these Asian community forestry programs represent a
rich mine of experience from which to draw lessons, identify future
challenges, and guide priorities in the worldwide search for a path
to sustainable development.
Important Lessons
The
experiences reviewed point to a number of positive lessons
applicable to community forestry programs and more broadly to the
many other programs related to sustainable development throughout
the world.
Local
people can be an asset to conservation.
In the search
for ways to protect the environment, some strategies emphasize
excluding people from ecologically sensitive areas. Indeed, such
exclusion was the basis of longstanding policies throughout Asia
that declared forest lands off-limits to people. The experience
reviewed here indicates that local people can be an important
resource in conserving and restoring forest lands. In country after
country, when given the opportunity, local people, many of them
extremely poor, have been willing to invest tremendous amounts of
their scarce time and resources to conserve forests and restore
degraded lands.
Community organizations are
essential.
In every
program examined in this report, the formation of local community
organizations was critical to the program's success. In some cases,
the organization was formed by the villagers themselves; in most
cases, an outside agent, an NGO or a government agency, played a
catalytic role. The community organization enabled villagers to
negotiate with government officials and provided a forum for airing
the many and often conflicting needs of the people dependent upon
the natural resource. As new rules and plans developed, it was the
community organization that enforced agreements and provided
members with the information, guidance, and coordination to
implement the plans.